Talk:Bavaria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bavaria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bavaria Top‑importance

	Bavaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Germany Top‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The antiquity section is bizzare.

1. Old Bavarian didn't become Old High German. It is classified as such among other German dialects like Allemannic.

2. The bavarians are basically elbe Germanic in their origin with a strong celtic and a smaller roman substrate. They obviously migrated there at some point. It's even sourced in the linked pages of the Germanic peoples that the bavarians supposedly emerged from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.24.247.84 (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subjected to ancientness.

"these peoples were famed, romanticized, and subjected to ancientness."

I suppose it's coherent, but it feels bizarre to describe anything as "subjected to ancientness". Isn't it enough to say that they were romanticized? Nitwit005 (talk) 01:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"romanticized" by whom?

"subjected to ancientness"? what does this mean and who subjected them to the ancientness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:2D10:5900:89F8:F0E2:51CA:5FE6 (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly the whole sentence seems weird. should probably be taken out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:1C81:99D0:7DEC:7F16:EA45:F04C (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rework of the Economics Section

I am of the opinion that the Economics section is pretty clunky and could use some major overhaul, including getting rid of some of the pictures and condensing everything down to a couple of paragraphs of prose. I don't think the images of silicon wavers or the Eurofighter contribute much to the readers understanding of the concept of bavaria. There also is an entire section about oil refinement (including pictures), which essentially states that oil refinement is not a major branch of bavarian economics. I am not entirely sure on what to keep and what to get rid of, so if anyone has thoughts on the matter, I would appreciate some input.

I think the Economy sections on the articles for Baden-Württemberg or North Rhine-Westphalia could serve as an example of how it should roughly be outlined. AmbitiousAmphibian (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]