Talk:Xanadu (film)

Image

1980? Then why was it not until about 1983 that the movie was released? Maybe I have this wrong.. I had the LP for a year befor ethe movie was released in Texas, --Rofthorax 07:38, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the image that was attached to the article. It was dismal in quality and had no information as to source or declaration of use. Using such an image is usually fair use, but it was such poor quality and cropped so badly that it was more a blotch than an asset to the article (stub or not). If someone wants to replace it with a decent image (with appropriate sourcing), please do so. —Frecklefoot 19:10, Mar 12, 2004 (UTC)

This article read like a commentary. Scientology and the film genre preferences of the gay are community are generaized. 199.212.129.2 12:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC) McKell[reply]

Separate section for Bway musical version

I am removing the reference to the broadway production under development and creating a new section, which can then be moved into a daughter article should the production open and take on its own relevance as a separate article.NYDCSP 06:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--The production begins previews this weekend, and it opens at the end of June. I think it might be a good idea to beging a page on the musical. Thanks--Broadwaygal 18:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article on the musical at Xanadu (musical). -- Ssilvers 23:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks, I guess I should have done more research. I was looking at the discussion page and thought that it hadn't happened yet. --Broadwaygal 23:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xanadu (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070218002133/http://www.playbill.com:80/news/article/105037.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/105037.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twice the budget?

"The movie was a box office failure, making only $23 million against a reported $20 million budget (to be profitable, movies must gross at least twice their budgets after all costs are taken into account).[2]" The cited source makes no claim that a movie must gross at least twice its budget, and this seems absurd on its face. Indy (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]