Talk:Gingerbread
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gingerbread article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Having ginger cake redirect here was put forth for Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep, i.e. to leave things as they are. The discussion for this redirect can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_23#Ginger_cake
As is clear from that, is in the "Redirects for discussion" on July 23 2011.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 16 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fstilwell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Russian gingerbread?
[edit]Gingerbread is considered to be a traditional sweet in Russia, and is extremely wide-spread there. It would make sense to reflect that in the article. --Humanophage (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This page was a bit of a muddle, basically because it seems different countries use "gingerbread" to mean different things. I have tried to sort it out - apologies if I have got anyone's normal usage wrong as a result. We could now do with some references to recipe books to support many of the statements. seglea (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Ginger cake should not redirect here
[edit]Ginger cake is quite different to gingerbread and should not redirect here. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
All right, the article does say that gingerbread can be soft cake, but I have always thought that that was ginger cake and that gingerbread is hard, being rather similar to a ginger nut biscuit. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Explanation for last comment
[edit]Gingerbread is more like a biscuit,which is often made into shapes - such as the famous gingerbread man. Ginger cake, which has a darker colour, is more like a sponge cake. Ergo, we should not get redirected here if we type "ginger cake".ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
It would be more sensible if typing "ginger cake" redirected to McVitie's, who make the ginger cakes - although I am well aware that Wikipedia should avoid advertisments. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
What you say may be true in your experience at this point in time, but is not generally true. I did not work on the article, but it reflects what I have read about gingerbread in a couple historical cookbooks. (In fact the cake form seems more common in early 1900's under the title "gingerbread.")It is certainly true that the term "gingerbread" refers to either. I also just looked up Mirriam Webster and OED definitions of "gingerbread," both of which list the cake form first and the shaped biscuit/cookie second. 131.238.213.46 (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
The redirect question
[edit]Some time ago, I suggested that ginger cake redirecting here should go in Redirects for discussion. Even if my proposal were defeated, should the fact that it was made be mentioned here? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks as if my proposal had been deleted, and I have now put up a tag indicating that the suggestion for having this as a "Redirect for Discussion" was defeated. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Copyediting question
[edit]This is a minor question concerning syntactical propriety. Cementing an absolute answer for me will be useful in the future, however, so I welcome your advice.
When this article makes mention of this first monk, is it proper to end any and all years mentioned within his lifetime with 'AD', or 'BCE'? I know it's quite obvious just which era it is, given that he's a christian monk, but should we include it, irrespective of that?
- Definitely not BCE which is "Before the Common Era" or "BC". The question is whether AD or CE or neither should be used. Personally I think that neither is required in this case. There is no real likelihood of people thinking it is BCE. Dabbler (talk) 20:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gingerbread. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310035724/http://www.annas.se/artikel.asp?artikelId=34&strukturId=55 to http://www.annas.se/artikel.asp?artikelId=34&strukturId=55
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=gingerbread
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)