Vanity/ advert/ broken link - it's got everything Cutler 11:19, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)
Keep As far as I have seen, there are many articles on Wikipedia relating to gaming clans, or websites that are of note within a certain community. Is it an advert? Well clans are non-commercial in nature. Broken link? What is Wiki for if not to fix things like that.. Vanity? Well I would have to agree on that one, but if I had someone else make a page about the clan, woundn't it be just as bad? The reason I think that this clan deserves an arcticle, is because it has become so known in the community, its become an institution within the Counterstrike custom modeling scene. --Jemimus 11:35, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete not a big fan of including clans in general, unless they're notable. These guys get get fewer than 500 google hits. Compare the number of hits to a more notable gaming clan 4 Kings' 3,210 hits (no affiliatons, just saw them in a documentary). Seems that if we're going to start including gaming clans, this one is not the right place to start. —siroχo 11:55, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Other clans can be nominated for VfD if they look non-notable, so please tag them. In this case, WP is not a web guide and needs to be careful not to give the impression that it is. Geogre 12:20, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable, Wikipedia is not a web guide. Somebody turned it into a redirect to Clan of the Dead Goat Gunshop, also on VfD, which is also non-notable. — Gwalla | Talk 23:32, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. If a clan can get sponsorship, go to Korea to compete, and get news articles written on it, then it's sufficiently notable. This one isn't. Average Earthman 01:17, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete vanity, violates spirit of autobiography restriction as well. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:59, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
