Talk:Environment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Environment page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | See Wikipedia:Wikiproject Environment for the recommended use of this topic. Consider linking pages that direct to this disambiguation to the following: |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of page
[edit]Shouldn't this page be called "Environment (disambiguation)"? In my opinion, the natural environment page should be called Environment. Eatanorange (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Since "Environment" is a word used in a number of different contexts and not simply for the natural environment or the biophysical environment it is best to keep this as the primary disambiguation page. I would like to see a single word that means "biophysical environment" ("bioment", "biophysiment"??) It would save a lot of confusion between ecology and environment. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is clearly a disambiguation page. According to Wikipedia: disambiguation, there are three scenarios for disambiguation pages. I think this page conforms to the first scenario (Joker), so that it is not necessary that the term "disambiguation" appears in the title. I think, nevertheless, that the lead paragraph is no longer necessary or even useful, so I will proceed to suppress it, unless there is some sound reason against it.--Auró (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Biophysical environment which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)