Talk:Korean reunification

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Korean reunification article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Korea Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article doesn't mention Vietnam-style unification or Korean War 2.0

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.15.166 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 5 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

Missing information

Should’ve include some of the reunification attempts in the past. Kim il sung did one sending ambassadors to a Korea and they were arrested. Baetylus (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comparisons section removal

I propose that the Comparisons section be removed. It's mostly WP:COATRACK, digressions, mostly not about the Koreas but about the other nations discussed. It brings the Koreas back into the discussion by scrounging for factors, often trivial ones, in which the Koreas differ from the other pairs of countries, either giving us no indication of what substantive difference they really make on the reunification question or being entirely speculative (even if it's another source's speculation). Perhaps the worst is the observation that the Koreas share a name for their respective currencies as do Romanian and Moldova, which is immaterial when assessing the prospects for Korean unification. The section's "relevant information quotient" is minimal. Largoplazo (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea may have exposed intention to abandon peaceful reunification for longer time

From this video I saw Kang Sun-nam made a long speech to heavily criticize America and South Korea during the 27 July 2023 parade, and a KCTV host have also spoke against South Korea, which seems translated as "The hated enemy 'Republic of Korea' will be perished during our fights' (in this video: 令人憎恶的“大韩民国”敌人将在我们的战斗中遭受灭亡), so I believe North Korea was already exposed its intention to end up its policy on peaceful reunification at the time. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]