Talk:Great Northern Railway (U.S.)

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	November 22, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota High‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Montana Mid‑importance

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Idaho / Iowa / North Dakota / Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Idaho portal This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance).
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

(US) vs. (United States)

Discussion about the title of this article and its recent change can be found at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (acronyms)#Changing article titles from XXXXX (US) to XXXXX (United States). Feel free to contribute. -- hike395 16:22, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I see that this issue is not settled as the page was moved 12:55, August 27, 2006 by PaulHanson (talk · contribs). I've left the user a note to ask why the page was moved seemingly without consensus. Slambo (Speak) 18:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing no consensus discussion elsewhere, I've moved it back. Slambo (Speak) 19:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago redirects to Chicago, Illinois

Since Chicago is just a redirect to Chicago, Illinois, it seemed pointless to pipe the user to Chicago when clicking on Chicago, Illinois. slambo 13:54, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

It used to be the opposite until two days ago. Not sure why, there doesn't seem to be consensus either way at Talk:Chicago, Illinois. JYolkowski // talk 17:29, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

That would explain the large number of "fixing Chicago link" messages in my watchlist two days ago. The so-called fix didn't seem to fix anything, but changed the displayed text from either Chicago, Illinois or Chicago, IL to just Chicago. The other editor didn't even use the pipe trick to keep the displayed text unchanged. Since the standard name format for pages about American cities is "City, State", and the other formats redirect to it, I didn't see much of a reason not to restore the original versions and bypass the redirects to Chicago, Illinois. slambo 17:58, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)

Route map

I'm working on a route map, using DeLorme Topo USA software (and, of course, a GN route map). I'm hoping I'll finish it and be able to upload it soon. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 21:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why isnt threre any thing about the survey thingy he did? someone put it on here —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeremey leestma (talk • contribs) 20:12, October 23, 2006.

Can anyone add something about the GN hotels in Glacier National Park? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.109.227.45 (talk) 16:59, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:GN Empire Builder combined.png

The image Image:GN Empire Builder combined.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: nomination withdrawn Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great Northern Railway (U.S.) → Great Northern Railway (United States) – I believe that the use of the full country name as the disambiguator is preferred, and the short form/abbreviation is discouraged. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename proposal withdrawn. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Acronyms as disambiguators says the abbreviation is preferred. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Drury, George H. (1994). The Historical Guide to North American Railroads: Histories, Figures, and Features of more than 160 Railroads Abandoned or Merged since 1930. Waukesha, Wisconsin: Kalmbach Publishing. pp. 144–148. ISBN 0-89024-072-8.. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Northern Railway (U.S.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128035128/http://rchs.com/dutiful_son%20Louis%20Hill.htm to http://www.rchs.com/dutiful_son%20Louis%20Hill.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Illinois terminus

It looks like it went all the way to Chicago and also included servicing State of Illinois. Unless that was a different railroad that should be dotted not red. B137 (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grandview Cut Material Did Not Fill False Creek

The amount of material excavated from the Grandview cut through 1913, 818,000 cubic yards, is far too small to have filled False Creek for the GNR station near Main Street. In May 1913 the Vancouver Province reported: "Looking over the scene of operations today with one of the G.N.R. engineers, The Province representative observed several trains at work... [with] gravel and sand brought from the company's gravel pits at Sapperton was being dumped by means of a scraper operated over flat cars, and spread by a gang of workmen... It is estimated at the present rate of progress that the reclamation work, grading, ... will take another two years." A May 1914 Vancouver Daily World article states: "At the present time the creek has been partly filled in with about one million cubic yards of sand, rock and silt dredged from the False Creek channel... [and the] railway will have to make of a fill of two million yards more. Part of this will be taken from the creek bed by the bulk of the fill will be hauled in from surrounding districts." 24.68.80.249 (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]