User talk:Harp Heaven

Welcome!

Hello, Harp Heaven, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Slightly belated, but welcome! Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:05, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

FF articles

Deffinetly looking forward to you joining the FF project. Making articles NPOV is a very important task. Judging by the featured article drive vote, the Final Fantasy VI article will most likly be the first article that we try pushing into FA status. So in my opinion, that'd be a great place for you to start. Please also feel free to vote for an article you'd like for us to focus on making into FA status. --ZeWrestler 13:58, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty good the way it is. I changed around some of the wording now, and I've edited out some bad content in the past. IMO, the biggest problem is the FFVIII article. Harp Heaven 14:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV in Pop Culture Project

Hi there! Just dropping you a note since you appear to be the founder of the "removing POV in pop culture article" wikiproject. I'm very interested in this goal, but noticed there's not a ton of activity on the project page, nor a sign up list. Is this project still active? --Lee Bailey 23:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Berserk.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Berserk.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. _JD^talk 01:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Spelljammer-screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Spelljammer-screenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Please note the same also applies to Image:Spelljammer-screenshot2.gif. Cheers --Pak21 12:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Removing POV from pop culture articles

Wikipedia:WikiProject Removing POV from pop culture articles, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Removing POV from pop culture articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Removing POV from pop culture articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 07:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Hoenig

The article Michael Hoenig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]