Talk:Discipline (King Crimson album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Crimson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Crimson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King CrimsonWikipedia:WikiProject King CrimsonTemplate:WikiProject King CrimsonKing Crimson articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 18:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Indiscipline improv.ogg

The image Image:Indiscipline improv.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed a good chunk from the The Sheltering Sky paragraph that, honestly, didn't have anything to do with the song at hand and should have been added to the Beat album. Revert it back, I suppose, if you really want to.

Let's stay on-topic here.

Removed a good chunk from the The Sheltering Sky paragraph that, honestly, didn't have anything to do with the song at hand and should have been added to the Beat album. Revert it back, I suppose, if you really want to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.249.112 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RC

Just a general question about assessments, or reviews, of popular music on Wikipedia: Why do we give a crap what Robert Christgau thinks?--Jelsova (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Discipline (King Crimson album). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/kingcrimson/albums/album/140727/review/5945614/discipline

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]