User talk:Wael Ellithy

Hey there! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump or The Reference Desk! Happy wiki-ing! Alexandros

Cite

What's your source for this edit? —Nightst a llion (?) 14:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question regarding SDG: the source was from ISO 4217 Amendment 136 issued 2007-02-23. Wael Ellithy 23:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And where can I find that? Thanks for the info, but we need a citeable source. —Nightst a llion (?) 13:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am subscribed to the ISO 4217 email Amendment-Notifications. This, like other ISO publications, are not free. Wael Ellithy 14:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And when will this information be publically announced? —Nightst a llion (?) 14:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if/when any ISO 4217 Amendments will be published. However, usually after few weeks some official page will be updated, mainly http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/popstds/currencycodeslist.html

As of this writing (2007-02-25), the above link claims that it was last modifed on 2006-11-21. Wael Ellithy 14:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks; we can't update the articles, though, until it's publically announced. When this happens, feel free to do so. :) —Nightst a llion (?) 14:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apache Axis2 Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apache Axis2 Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:200 egp obverse.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:200 egp obverse.jpeg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:200 egp reverse.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:200 egp reverse.jpeg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:100 egp reverse.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:100 egp reverse.jpeg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wael Ellithy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20031 was submitted on Dec 12, 2017 17:50:38. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TREX

The article TREX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article cites no sources and reads like an advertisement from a website about the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goveganplease (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Covid-19 daily deaths in top 5 countries and the world.png

A tag has been placed on File:Covid-19 daily deaths in top 5 countries and the world.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (talk) 04:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]