User talk:Neschek

archives: 1

Shingles

It's hardly completely my own work. I wrote herpes zoster but soon discovered that shingles was extant, and I merged a lot of that into the article. We had a nice presentation in our hospital recently about chickenpox in adults, which prompted me to give the article a little overhaul. Thanks for your kind words. JFW | T@lk 18:20, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

When Will You Be Thanked?

Salve, Neschek!
Thanks for your answer on the WP:RD re the Maroon 5 video. I kept thinking the mother looked like Stockard Channing but knew it wasn't her. So we have a start.
Say, are you going to Miami? I was just in Oxford on Sunday and live in Warren County. PedanticallySpeaking 19:00, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)

Just passing through. Sunday was such a beautiful day and I took a ride, finding myself in Oxford in time. PedanticallySpeaking 19:05, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Infocom was responsible for the bulk of games I bought my first few years in college, and I want to try and make the articles about the company and the games as complete as possible. It's always nice to hear compliments, thank you very much! -DynSkeet 19:15, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Famous Miamians

Salve, Neschek!
Hope this message finds you well. I wrote an article this week on General Durbin Ward, who attended Miami back in the 1840's. I added him to the Miami University article, which has a list of grads and people who went there, but it was deleted by a newer user (he has 30 edits). I wonder, as someone associated with Miami (famously or otherwise), if you'd offer your two cents at Talk:Miami University#Durbin Ward. PedanticallySpeaking 14:31, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

Intraspecific Breeding

I have reverted the edit you made to intraspecific breeding. A liger is not an example of intraspecific breeding and was one of the reasons why the article was originally nominated for vfd by Rick - because the information it contained was incorrect. Megan1967 06:48, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Canadian Extreme Wrestling Party

I agree. It was pretty dire. I doubt that anything more need be added to that article. If there weer a VfD, I would only half-heartedly oppose it, even though I'm responsible for creating most of the article about Canadian fringe parties. Ground Zero 16:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Bomb Dogs

Non-notability isn't grounds for speedy deletion. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:29, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry — gibberish is a ground. The place to look is: Wikipedia:Criteria for peedy deletion. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:13, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ronglokepy

Just wanted to let you know that the creator of the ronglokepy article vandalized your user page twice. I reverted and warned him, and will block him the next time he does anything (he also vandalized the maple syrup article). Thanks for nominating articles for speedy deletion. Academic Challenger 04:01, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"The American Dream"

{{db|go back to sleep}} a dream i once had...

Heh :). Thue | talk 18:45, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

speedies

Heya, thanks for helping out on RC patrol, but please make sure articles have no revisions that aren't speedies before marking them as such. --fvw * 01:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vurgh, sorry... -- — I. Neschek | talk 01:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 03:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Sofapunch back from the dead

I was reading the talk page for Miami University and saw your (old) comment about Sofapunch. The band is no longer around here in Oxford, but was probably put on the MU page because all the students recognize the name and for a while, the band was involved with a lot of university-sanctioned social functions. I agree that it probably shouldn't be in the article, but now you have some background info. Smolamj (talk) 03:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

As a current or past contributor to a USCG Auxiliary article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

COASTIE I am (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Neschek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Neschek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]