Talk:National myth

Mythology Top‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human Genetic History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History articles

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Myth??

The section about China, what part of Sun Yat-sen in his role for the creation of the Republic of China a myth? The wikipedia articles on gunpowder and compass clearly indicate those are Chinese inventions. Are we saying these articles present myths? --Kvasir 02:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"A national myth is an inspiring, or patriotic story or anecdote that serves as a national symbol of a country, and re-affirms a country's "national values." A national myth may sometimes take the form of a 'national epic'."

This definition, in the first line of the article, doesn't seem to be in consistent use throughout the article. Several of the "myths" are very dubious examples of "national myths", and display an obvious USA-centrism in their much wider interpretation of the term for that section than for any other sections. See "Rosa Parks' resistance to compulsory racial segregation in the Montgomery, Alabama bus system is celebrated as the spark of the American Civil Rights Movement. Certain elements of the story have been arguably mythologized, however—Parks was an NAACP activist, and not the first to challenge segregation laws on a Montgomery bus or otherwise." If we included every significant figure in every nation's history whose importance has (debatably) been exaggerated or whose every minor background detail is not universally known, we'll need to make this page two hundred times as long, because countless other historical figuers have been similarly romanticized in terms of importance alone. I thought a national myth had to have elements of the story that were idealized, not just the importance of the story itself in a certain part of history overstated? And even then, Rosa Parks is indisputably of great historical importance, one way or another, so what's the point of this? -Silence 16:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

France

As a French person I was rather amused to see your choice of myths. This selection would still have been acceptable 50 years ago, but I think later events (the Resistance for example), loom larger in French memories. And the best remembered episode from the French Revolution is not the execution of King Louis, but the storming of the Bastille.--Anne97432 15:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia

The entry for Estonia lists Kalevipoeg. I'm not sure it's entirely appropriate alone, as this does not appear to fully match the definitions specified above. Perhaps, myths dating from the Estonian War of Independence should be added. Digwuren 00:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inflammatory reference

Petri Krohn has twice ([1], [2]) introduced a "For communication of falsehoods, see National mysticism" link here. While I agree that the reference is useful, I believe that this description is problematic, and so have replaced it with a standard "See also" template. Digwuren 02:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template {{seealso}} is not a standard hat text template, template {{for}} is!

As for the clamed POV: Category:National mysticism is included in

All three are included in Category:Communication of falsehoods. I can see no argument that National mysticism is not "communication of falsehoods". In fact, this is the defining characteristic that differentiates it from a national myth, and should thus be stated in the "for" text.

Besides, the only reason User:Digwuren is here, is that he is stalking me, and has for the last month summarily revered every edit I have made. -- Petri Krohn 02:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be the purpose of this article to elucidate the various shapes and forms taken by "national myths", from merely anecdotal or traditional folklore, to national mysticist or ethnic nationalist fanaticism. Of course a national myth includes "communication of falsehood". The question is, who is fooling whom. In Switzerland, for example, there is the Rütlischwur. Nobody assumes this is anything like a historical event. It is nevertheless treated as a venerable fable symbolizing national origins. A bit like Santa Claus -- nobody is going to stop the custom just because it involves "communication of falsehood". At the other end of the scale, you have fanaticist stuff like the Battle of Kosovo in Serb nationalism. The battle itself is, of course, historical. But the national myth that has grown up around it is just as obviously a "communication of falsehood", but in this case, one of relaxed folklore and tradition, but one used to whip people into ethnic hatred and civil war. This makes for a complicated topic, and the article fails to address any of it in more than a superficial WP:LEAD sort of way. I suggest we need to lose the "list of national myths" and implement a coherent discussion of the topic instead. --dab (𒁳) 12:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of national myths

Should i expand it by adding more examples or explaining the existing examples in paragraphs? Drew Stanley (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain, using material fro the original article, mainly the lead. In your edit summary say copied from whatever. Use sources. Doug Weller talk 18:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks I am working on this. I think we can remove King asleep in the mountain from the list unless anyone disagrees. Drew Stanley (talk) 14:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to keep Treaty of Waitangi, but it is a document that has implications to mythos, while the others seem to be myths in the traditional sense.Drew Stanley (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is King Asleep in case someone decides to add it back

King asleep in the mountain: Common folklore motif in many European cultures, revolves around a legendary hero/leader that lies dormant in a hidden place, but will one day awaken to save his people in their hour of need.

@User:Doug Weller, do you or anyone else have any suggestions or advice for how to organize the examples? Drew Stanley (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary myths

This section is about the myth of nationalism as an ideology itself, rather than national myths. How can this be clearer? Should i move it somewhere else? Drew Stanley (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]