Jump to content

Talk:Oath of Allegiance (Ireland)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page will at some point have to be renamed Irish Oath of Allegiance Andrew Yong 16:58, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)

There is no such thing as the Irish Oath of Allegiance. It wasn't an oath of allegiance to Ireland, nor to the king, but to the Irish Free State. Under Wiki naming conventions require the creation of a name in the format [[Oath of Allegiance (Ireland)]], but only if other articles on other oaths are written, in which case Oath of Allegiance would become a disambigulation page. FearÉIREANN 18:43, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Crown in Ireland

[edit]

Thought some comment should be added and this historical formula mentioned in wikipedia.Stamboul 11:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This seems biased. Can we get a bias header on top of this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.104.188.200 (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction

[edit]

There's an issue in the "Reaction" section with the outline of the anti-treaty campaigner's objections to the oath. Before 1931, it literally was to the British king that politicians gave their allegiance. After 1931, it wasn't, though the campaigners may still have perceived the monarch of the Irish Free State to be the British monarch. Maybe something like this would work: "The oath was widely condemned by the anti-treaty campaigners for requiring Irish politicians to give allegiance to the British king, who the campaigners continued to consider was monarch of the Irish Free State even after the enactment of the Statute of Westminster 1931." --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 01:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's better the way it is. DrKiernan (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The way it is misleads readers into believing the oath was always to the British monarch or it confuses readers by making a claim that doesn't align with information found in many places elsewhere on Wikipedia. That's not better than clarity and accuracy. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 17:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing wrong with it. DrKiernan (talk) 17:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 18:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not clear or accurate to discuss events that happened five years later in the midst of a discussion about events five years before. Events should be presented in a logical chronological order to facilitate understanding. DrKiernan (talk) 10:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph doesn't speak of the end of what it's describing. It thus isn't just about a specific point in time "five years before", it reads as a description of feelings (against an oath to the British monarch) that arose at a point in time (the implementation of the oath) and continued thereafter; the implication from the rest of the article is it was until the issue triggering the feelings (the oath) disappeared. Hence, it's not contrary to chronology to mention a relevant change (the end of the British monarch's reign in the IFS) that took place between those two aforementioned moments. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did British insist on it?

[edit]

This article is heavily pov, essentially blaming Collins and the Irish for the Oath/fidelity idea. Yet, it doesn't answer the more obvious question of why an Oath of any sort was necessary and why the British were so insistent upon it given the clear Irish opposition to it during the Treaty negotiations (See, for instance, Childers to DeValera 21,10.1921 and Dev to Griffith, 25.10.1921). Can anybody answer why the British didn't just drop the idea/ why did they insist upon humiliating the Irish? 188.141.10.11 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oath of Allegiance (Ireland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oath_of_Allegiance_(Ireland)&oldid=1202634053"