Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reciprocity theory
Appearance
Complete nonsense, and the author has added links to the page which have nothing to do with it. 62.32.16.7 15:21, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Can't tell what the heck they're talking about. --Wolf530 15:37, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and rewrite. It's a real theory and doesn't fare too badly on the Google test. The content however, is a copyvio. David Johnson 16:10, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't agree that the article in question is anything other than facile gobbledygook. There are a number of theories that would qualify as "theory of reciprocity", the most common hits I get are to a work on game theory by Armin Falk and Urs Fischbacher, nothing to do with this gibberish. Delete and make room for the real McCoy. --Minority Report (entropy rim riot) 02:33, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete and make room for the real McCoy, as Minority Report (entropy rim riot) so well put it. -leigh 10:12, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)