Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infranet

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 14:15, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Infranet

There are two different definitions here. The one refers to a concept and product that does not actually exist at this time, and the other is a non-notable internet billing service. Indrian 15:57, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

Keep From its beginnings as a Juniper buzzword the Infranet initiative has become a real industry group with participation from almost every major player in telecom. See [1]. --Gmaxwell 18:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: After discovering this article via VFD I have extensively updated it and would be glad to continue updating it to keep it up to wikipedia standards. --Gmaxwell 20:25, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
After looking at Gmaxwell's expansion, this appears notable and interesting--for example, several major telecom companies appear to be involved in this effort, at least peripherally, proving it's not just vaporware made up by some small-time group. Keep. Meelar (talk) 21:59, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
Keep-Interesting and very encyclopedic. Hopefully it will continue to be expanded. -CunningLinguist 23:38, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and expand. Notable. Megan1967 04:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vaporware at the moment. Might be worth adding once there's a there there. Whig 07:29, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.