Talk:Calaveras County, California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambot (talk • contribs) 21:31, 26 July 2003 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Government and Politics section

We are not going to revisit this again. Nope. Wikipedia is NOT a political battleground, and election results are a matter of public record, no matter which way they turn out. You cannot simply remove information from an article because it is not favorable to one party or another. Instead, rewording is a better option in this case, as I have done in the article.

This has happened before, back in August of 2008. The same kind of politics-based edit warring was going on, with some biting comments included in the edit descriptors. ("LEAVE MY EDITS ALONE." (Wikipedia is not Chris Crocker!), "It is currently being edited by a fervent REPPUBLICAN who refuses to let the DEMOCRATS have a voice.") Again, Wikipedia is NOT the place for either Reps or Dems to seek a "voice". Rivendweller, as you are one of our newer editors, I suggest you see Wikipedia policies at Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and Wikipedia is not a battleground. In short, we're not going to go there, albeit a second time. Edit Centric (talk) 09:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rivendweller, what I would suggest is, instead of REMOVING information to make the section lean more towards a certain direction, you WORK THE ARTICLE; gather MORE information about the recent swing in the voting and registration trends! ADD information, and BUILD the section. To simply say; "We're gonna remove some info to make it look more or less favorable to one side or the other" is to deny access to that removed information. That is neither constructive, nor is it appropriate for Wikipedia. Give the reader ALL the information, let THEM draw their own conclusions. By ALL the information, I also mean information that can be added to document any change in the voting demographics from point A towards center, or even past center towards point B! I'm sure if you look, it's out there. Once again, work the article, don't tear pieces from it. Edit Centric (talk) 07:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It's nearly always bad to remove information from Wikipedia, unless it's flatly incorrect or wrong or slanderous. If its presense unblanaces something, leave it, and figure out how to balance it. But removing good stuff denies other access to it, as has been noted. S B H arris 08:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback on 2009 02 04

Just a quick notation / justification for recent rollback, was done under WP:SPAM. The removed link was a spam addition by unregistered IP editor. Edit Centric (talk) 06:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

8th Senate District

Calaveras County is not in the 8th Senate District. If you click on that link, it shows that the 8th Senate District represent parts of San Francisco and San Mateo Counties, but comes nowhere close to Calaveras County. RNealK (talk) 04:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Calaveras County, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calaveras County, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Demographics

"Non-native, non-black" is totally unspecific and an poorly veiled attempt at political correctness. This is an encyclopedia, not a social justice blog. Fix it.

2601:4C0:8004:4670:5C53:9F0F:A44F:AB3A (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheriffs

According to the article, Alexander Hunter recently began his 161st year as county sheriff. It might be desirable for someone to do something about updating that. Rick DiBasilio is the current (2019) one, according to the county website. He took office in May 2016 following the death of Gary Kuntz, according to an archived 2018 Union-Democrat article ((https://www.uniondemocrat.com/localnews/6291667-151/calaveras-county-sheriff-election-likely-to-head-to)) David Downum held the position on the 2008 WayBack page that rather quaintly serves as the article reference for the Board of Supervisors.

I apologize, but I don't have time to research this any further; I only followed up to the extent I did because the Hunter reference showing no end date for his tenure seemed ludicrous.Ajericn (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]