Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value of life

add to this deletion debate

Personal philosophical ideas of the editors, hardly real information. Get-back-world-respect 13:02, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• Keep - looks like it needs work to me, not deletion. -- Cyrius | (talk) 13:29, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Legitimate concept in multiple fields. Also, edited by 7 reg users and no VfD tag. Niteowlneils 16:06, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Jacob1207 18:24, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Valid discussion of substantive issue. Denni 20:31, 2004 Apr 4 (UTC)
• At least the clock on this request needs to be restarted from now, because no notificaton was placed on the page. Does no one care about that part of the procedure? Dandrake 06:25, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, btw, for all the reasons above. Dandrake 06:25, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. These are important questions that are covered in business and economics classes, but only in the most cursory ways. The topic is inherently POV, but the article has presented it in a fairly NPOV manner. mydogategodshat 21:02, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)