Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zetapets

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 16:45, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Zetapets

Article on a website, 6000 Google hits, Alexa ranking of 391,976. Delete. JoaoRicardo 03:19, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Weak keep, like neopets but not included in happy meals, its hits probably dropped off due to recent down time--nixie 03:38, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
del. 04:25, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC). Sorry, forgot to sign. Mikkalai 04:57, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Note: Comment by Mikkalai. --InShaneee 04:46, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, but with reservations. Article needs expansion. Megan1967 06:18, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Comment. More expansion is needed for me to make an informed opinion. Zzyzx11 06:58, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. ComCat 09:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, seems notable enough, should be expanded. — Asbestos | Talk 09:39, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Since there's oodles of online games, I fail to see what's so notable about this one. Weak delete. Radiant! 12:39, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
keep, provided somebody can come up with some content for the article. as it stands, it's all meta-talk about the site. Avriette 14:03, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
keep, I am the current ad-hoc author of this article - which I have added to since it has undergone the 'Vote for Deletion'. I am writing mainly from memory and references I have noted pre-downtime and I will endeavour to continue the editing of this article throughout the next few days to make it a more complete wiki entry. 03:08, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) (Mosey)
- Mosey, please note that the size of the article is not the reason it's up here. Rather, not all of us are convinced that this online game is special amidst the thousands of other online games.--Radiant! 09:34, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. This isn't even one of the more significant Neopets clones. -Aranel ("Sarah") 22:06, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete I'd had some difficulty making this decision, but the new edits of the page have me sold. The article is pure advertising, and the site itself has little to no notability aside from the fact that it looks like Neopets. Worth a note on the Neopets page at very best, but nothing else. --InShaneee 03:07, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't quite understand how the article is pure advertising? I am attempting to follow the format of the 'Neopets' entry (starting from Account Basics) since that appears to be the one of the main reference points of these opinions. Perhaps I should start from Controversy and Criticism? Thank you InShaneee however for editing my original entry to a more suitable format for Wiki. --Mosey 05:35, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC) (just created an account)
Weak keep. I'm reaaaaally waiting for this to impress me; I might change my vote if it doesn't. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 06:41, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. The Recycling Troll 09:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Tentative delete. Doesn't appear to be notable. RadicalSubversiv E 20:34, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, advertisement for an online game with 460 unique google hits and 35 players online as of right now. NN. —Korath (Talk) 12:45, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.