Talk:Thomas Galbraith, 2nd Baron Strathclyde
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Thomas Galbraith (Born 1960) → Thomas Galbraith, 2nd Baron Strathclyde — To conform to WP:NCPEER. Also, as per WP:QUALIFIER, years of birth should not normally be used for disambiguation. The subject of this article is known universally as Lord Strathclyde or Thomas Strathclyde, never Galbraith. The page was moved without discussion or edit summary. Can't move back due to a bot edit to fix a double redirect. JRawle (Talk) 01:35, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Lord Strathclyde redirects to Baron Strathclyde so is presumably similarly ambiguous, but what about Thomas Strathclyde as the article title? Thomas Galbraith is ambiguous, but Thomas Strathclyde doesn't seem to be, so if it's in common use as you claim it might be a better choice. Andrewa (talk) 04:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Pending any consensus on a change of article name, I have reverted the recent series of unilateral moves, so that the article is now at Thomas Galbraith, 2nd Baron Strathclyde, which AFAICS was the stable name since the article was created 7 years ago. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- That guideline reads in part However, there are several exceptions: Some peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names have their articles so titled, e.g. Bertrand Russell (not "Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell").... Another exception given by the guideline is Margaret Thatcher. The nominator claims that The subject of this article is known universally as Lord Strathclyde or Thomas Strathclyde (my emphasis), and the article suggests another similar name Tom Strathclyde, but I note that it's not Maggie Thatcher so probably not Tom. It seems to me that the intention of the guideline is to prefer a common name where one is prevalent, and that this may well be a case in point. Andrewa (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- The intent of the guideline is quite clear ...peers, usually have their articles titled "Personal name,Peerage title", then there are the exceptions of which we are looking for people known 'almost exclusively' by their 'surname'. He's generally called LS and sometimes Tom S - which is not remotely close to meeting the exception clause Garlicplanting (talk) 15:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- That guideline reads in part However, there are several exceptions: Some peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names have their articles so titled, e.g. Bertrand Russell (not "Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell").... Another exception given by the guideline is Margaret Thatcher. The nominator claims that The subject of this article is known universally as Lord Strathclyde or Thomas Strathclyde (my emphasis), and the article suggests another similar name Tom Strathclyde, but I note that it's not Maggie Thatcher so probably not Tom. It seems to me that the intention of the guideline is to prefer a common name where one is prevalent, and that this may well be a case in point. Andrewa (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Retain stable name of Thomas Galbraith, 2nd Baron Strathclyde per long-standing and stable guideline WP:NCPEER. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Retain stable name of Thomas Galbraith, 2nd Baron Strathclyde per Bhg. Johnbod (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
30/8/2012 - edit
[edit]I have removed a significant section of the article as it seemed to be mostly supposition (and not a little bit of smear) rather than encyclopaedic. I regret I am unable to contribute something back to the article at this point. As a final note, my IP address for this edit is with East Midlands Trains (I will readily confess to being a nerd).
Yours;
Tim Oliver — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.183.8 (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (peerage) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (peerage) articles
- Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of peers
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of politicians and government-people
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles