Talk:Ralph Griswold

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Untitled

Please find more dates and context for this man's life! Deserves far better than a stub.

SNOBOL primitive by today's standards?

I'm not sure that the statement that SNOBOL is primitive by 21st century standards is supportable. While it's true that SNOBOL was card oriented, as were FORTRAN and COBOL, many have noted that SNOBOL pattern matching has advantages to facilities in more "modern" programming languages.

Perhaps an expanded comment about it being card oriented would be appropriate, or maybe such a discussion belongs in SNOBOL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanHenderson (talk • contribs) 12:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SNOBOL4 is one-of-a-kind. It is so unlike anything then or now that it can't be classed as advanced or primitive. It's just ... different. People may well consider its flow-of-control to be primitive but that's like saying that Prolog's flow-of-control is primitive. It's only primitive if you ignore the automatic backtracking. SNOBOL has that same automatic backtracking in the pattern matching -- plus it has several different kinds of goto including a computed goto which is capable of transfer to dynamically created labels. As far as gotos are concerned that's pretty advanced. -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ralph Griswold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024035703/http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200610/msg00020.html to http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200610/msg00020.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]