Talk:Results May Vary

Results May Vary has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 5, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
January 29, 2017	Peer review	Not reviewed

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 10, 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Laughably bad?

The lyrics are considered laughably bad by who? That sentence is either NPOV, or sources desperately need to be cited. For god's sake anyway, Chocolate Starfish on the whole has far worse lyrics anyway. - Nova Prime 13:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LimpBizkitResultsMayVary.jpg

Image:LimpBizkitResultsMayVary.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Limp bizkit results may vary.jpg

Image:Limp bizkit results may vary.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

Why were the 0 star reviews removed? They were just as notable as the other more positive reviews. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.115.27.191 (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Underneath the Gun

Do you really think the search for "Underneath the Gun" should redirect to Results May Very? A deathcore band formed under this name in 2004, they broke up by the end of 2009, but may qualify under notability for Wikipedia status. If there page does get created, should it take the "Underneath the Gun" slot, or have it as "Underneath the Gun (band)"? • GunMetal Angel 01:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Results May Vary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/l/limp_bizkit/news_feature_100103/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/l/limp_bizkit/launch_feature_030919/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/l/limp_bizkit/news_feature_100103/index2.jhtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/165032p-144558c.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dotmusic.com/reviews/Albums/September2003/reviews30984.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playlouder.com/review/+resultsmayvary/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://launch.yahoo.com/read/album.asp?contentID=214738
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/l/limp_bizkit/news_feature_100103/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/l/limp_bizkit/launch_feature_030919/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Smith timetable

Just curious, anyone know about when he joined, and then left? The article currently makes it sound like he left pretty early on, but when looking at sources to consult on a few things, it seems like he was with them for a while, playing at a number of live shows and everything. Just curious. Could be worth noting if it was covered in sources. Sergecross73 msg me 15:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article makes it sound like he was out of the band before recording finished, and as a result he wasn't very present on the record. However, he was still in the band the year after. What I'm pretty sure what happened is that most of the songs were already recorded, since he was only in the band for a few months at the time of release. I've got no sources to back that up, but as it stands, events happening as the article states them is impossible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.186.228.249 (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Results May Vary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Welch does NOT play on this album

Combing through all possible track information, it’s come to my realization that Brian Welch only appeared with Limp Bizkit at Wrestlemania 19, even during the cited episode of MTV’s Album Launch, it shows Elvis Baskette playing the guitar part to ‘Build a Bridge’ 2603:8001:2E07:2D00:EC53:6513:86B0:40F5 (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nu Metal genre

Nu metal genre.

Multiple sources claim Limp Bizkit to be a, first and foremost, a nu metal band; including:

Limp Bizkit’s profile at Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/se/artist/limp-bizkit/105544?l=en-GB — “Nu Metal pioneers”.

Spotify’s official Nu Metal play list, featuring Fred Durst on the cover. https://open.spotify.com/playlist/37i9dQZF1DXcfZ6moR6J0G

On each and every Loudwire article, for example, https://loudwire.com/best-limp-bizkit-album-vote/ — “one of the most beloved Nu Metal bands”, and https://loudwire.com/limp-bizkit-cover-metallica-master-puppets-videos/ — “Nu Metal version”.

On each and every Metal Hammer / Louder Than Sound article, for example: https://www.loudersound.com/news/limp-bizkit-fred-durst-new-look-european-tour — “nu metal daddies”, and https://www.loudersound.com/news/limp-bizkit-gunenrsbury-park-london-announced — “nu metal legends”.

Fred Durst referring to himself as the “king of nu metal” on track 4 “Turn It Up, B*tch” from their latest album ‘Still Sucks’ (2021).

Additionally -and on the same song- referring to the band as “nu metal one hit wonders”.

Wikipedia’s Nu metal page: “Nu metal became popular in the late 1990s with bands and artists such as Korn, Limp Bizkit, and Slipknot all releasing albums that sold millions of copies.”

The Guardian: https://amp.theguardian.com/music/2023/aug/13/limp-bizkit-review-piece-hall-halifax-nu-metal — “nu metal elders”.

Multiple Revolver articles including: https://www.revolvermag.com/music/10-wildest-nu-metal-performances — “Wild nu metal performances”.

Multiple Kerrang! Articles including: https://www.kerrang.com/amp/limp-bizkit-how-significant-other-saw-the-nu-metal-anti-heroes-take-over-the-world — “the nu Metal anti-heroes”

These are just a few examples (quick google search, first hits) to prove that Limp Bizkit is widely recognized as a nu metal band. Acknowledged by the band members themselves, the media, the critics and the fans.

Hope with this information you reconsider your position and change the main genre on their Wikipedia page.

Thank you , Warm regards,

@Materialscientist Cambodia3DBY (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]