Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabbage Hit
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete for patent nonsense and recreation. -- AllyUnion (talk) 10:50, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
BJAODN- --Box of Rice 09:04, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN You beat me :) Preisler 09:06, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- No, just delete. User:Box of Rice, if you think that this is BJAODN, why did you write it in the first place? And why did you remove my {{delete}}? -- Hoary 09:48, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
- What the hell are you talking about? I never wrote it- just look in the history!, and what delete notice? You never put one up. stop ruining this for everyone. This is a vote, not a complaint centre. --Box of Rice 09:54, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Comment I think something very odd has happened here. Some kind of edit conflict perhaps. But Box of Rice, the history says you created the page. Preisler 10:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Comment The edit pattern shown by Special:Contributions/Box_of_Rice seems a little bizarre to me. What has happened here? -- Brhaspati (talk, contribs) 10:07, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
- User:Box of Rice is under the illusion that he's a very witty fellow, and is subjecting us all to his wit. Some might call it vandalism. -- Hoary 10:17, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
- I actually find it pretty amusing but nominating yourself to BJAODN is a little much so changing my vote to delete. Hoary don't let the vandals get to you. Preisler 10:25, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- User:Box of Rice is under the illusion that he's a very witty fellow, and is subjecting us all to his wit. Some might call it vandalism. -- Hoary 10:17, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
- Patent nonsense, belongs to BJAODN. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 12:54, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN well, I got a laugh out of it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:55, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Article nominated for deletion by its own author and sole (apart from deletion taggers) editor. Speedy delete under criterion G7. Uncle G 14:04, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
- Speed deleted as silly vandalism. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:15, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The page has been resurrected. I have listed it for VfD again. 193.167.132.66 09:58, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.