Talk:Majo

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Personal knowledge as Spanish speaker.
Definitions of majo and maja at Diccionarios.com.
Various websites about Goya and suchlike that can be found with a quick Google search.

Feel free to add more content and more sources. — Gulliver ✉ 12:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's just not good enough. Maikel (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image

If they distinguished themselves by wearing elaborate clothing then why is there a portrait of a naked lady on the top of the article??? I'm going to assume it is vandalism and remove it. Miagirljmw14 Miagirljmw_talk 20:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page Split

I think this page really needs to be split into a disambiguation page and the majo of an artistic scene. There's already a "For the Swedish singer from The Sounds, see Maja Ivarsson." line, so shouldn't we have a page full of the "other uses"? I'll create a disamb. page in 7 days if there are no contraindications or disagreements below (let me know if you think I'm wrong!). Mononomic (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi there. i deleted the lines that talked about the expressions of the yougnsters in the territory of Aragon using "majo" and their derivative words , cause they were not relevant at all... (the word "majo" and similar expressions are used by the youg people in all the territories of Spain). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.152.128.100 (talk) 13:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lower Class?

From everything here they appear to be quite well-off ... It doesn't appear that any majos or majas would be digging ditches or working in fields. Is the intention that they are from the lower eschelons of spanish upper class society of that time? or maybe it is Society with a capital S, implying that society is only referring to polite society, again upper classes? Cullen kasunic (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made the change please correct if needed Cullen kasunic (talk) 15:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. Please don't edit on the basis of your own guesses - find sources. Like other contemporary street-dandies, they are usually said to have come from the urban lower middle class. See Muscadin etc. Johnbod (talk) 01:54, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Majo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106043446/http://madripedia.es/wiki/Tipos_castizos to http://www.madripedia.es/wiki/Tipos_castizos

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Majo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516194550/http://www.noticias.info/Archivo/2005/200503/20050323/20050323_54055.shtm to http://www.noticias.info/Archivo/2005/200503/20050323/20050323_54055.shtm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]