Talk:Cambridge Castle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cambridge Castle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cambridge Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 11, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / Medieval / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can anyone get me more information on this castle? I ask as the user who added this page appears to be a vandal, and brief web search for "Cambridge Castle" tells me that, while there was a castle, the only part that remains is the motte, as the stone was carted away. -g026r

Article expanded

I've given the castle article a thorough update, but it will probably need a decent copy-edit. Took me back to when I had to write about the castle in my junior school! Hchc2009 (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cambridge Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Johnfos (talk) 23:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely illustrated, thoroughly researched and well written. Broad in coverage with a substantial amount of historical detail also. Good referencing. Neutral and stable. Passed. Johnfos (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

Why change the citation style from using {{cite}}, which preserves the metadata, to the consistent but poor style? I think it's better to use the template, as the better "style" and to encourage future citations in this form rather than stick with a poorer form for the sake consistency. Rich257 (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cambridge Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016051022/http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/leisure/archaeology/outreach/sites/sites_cambridge.htm to http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/leisure/archaeology/outreach/sites/sites_cambridge.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]