Category talk:Queens consort
Appearance
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Queen consorts or Queens consort
[edit]Shouldn't this be "Queens consort"? -- Jmabel | Talk 21:33, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
- I went with the pre-existing subcategories. Queen consort uses both .. -- User:Docu
- This should most definitely be "Queens consort". Rje 19:42, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. I replaced Polish queen consorts with Polish queens consort. Appleseed (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I disagree. By the same logic, "Queen Mothers" would be "Queens Mother", etc. What's more, it sounds and looks like a possessive construct with improper punctuation. Cleduc 00:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Both dictionary.com and m-w.com say the plural is queens consort. Appleseed (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Category talk page move
[edit]Please note that this talk page has been moved here as part of a category rename per CFD. Thank you. --S up? 21:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Category-Class Women's History articles
- NA-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Category-Class WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- Category-Class biography articles
- Category-Class biography (royalty) articles
- NA-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles