Talk:Wharf
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wharf article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
Well-known wharves?
[edit]At this point the "well-known wharves" is basically an advertising section for various seaside locations. Most of the content is not notable enough for this article. Frankly I don't believe a list of "well-known wharves" is necessary regardless for this article. I propose stripping the section entirely.
--Mcorazao (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- OK, since there was no feedback I went ahead and removed this section as advertising. Please feel free to object/revert/whatever ... --Mcorazao (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Merged
[edit]FYI: I merged quay with this article and redirected quay accordingly
--Mcorazao (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- The etymology section does not even mention quay any longer. This merge seems inappropriate. 67.86.75.96 (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand. The original "Quay" article did not provide an etymology for the word. So what does "any longer" mean? --Mcorazao (talk) 04:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Other Terms
[edit]Should terms like "pier", "dock" and "jetty" be defined and differentiated from "wharf" and "quay"? 98.244.137.86 (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)kolef98.244.137.86 (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)