Talk:Odes (Horace)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Latin High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I was somewhat surprised at how thin this page was, given that Horace's Odes are a major work in Latin literature. I've added content which I consider basic to a cursory appreciation of the collection; I could write more, but fear I'd be getting too far off the verifiable, objective criteria required of Wikipedia. Hope you find it useful Chjones 60656 02:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, thanks Ceyockey. I pressed the wrong button, literature cat not stub. I am using Jag123 script [1] which makes these changes easy. Unless you press the wrong button like me. Onco p53 02:55, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I don't think the reference to Tennyson is correct. The cited passage from "The Princess" reads "... followed then A classic lecture, rich in sentiment, With scraps of thunderous Epic lilted out By violet-hooded Doctors, elegies And quoted odes, and jewels five-words-long That on the stretched forefinger of all Time Sparkle for ever..."

There is no hint that the odes are those of Horace, whose name nowhere appears in the poem. --PryceJD (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yet it seems that Tennyson was familiar with Horace's Odes and translated parts of two of them (Pollard, A. (1982). "Three Horace Translations by Tennyson". Tennyson Research Bulletin. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 16-24.) So when he says "odes" he presumably means Horace. Pollard (p. 19) thinks Tennyson is referring to such phrases as donec virenti canities abest / morosa, which he had trouble translating. Kanjuzi (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes for deletion results

This article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in accordance with the deletion policy on February 2005. The result of this nomination was keep. Please see this page's entry for archive of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 09:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Michie translation

Please see my remarks on this translation & its author, James Michie. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 12:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)--NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 12:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Odes (Horace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050106221827/http://quadrant.org.au:80/php/archive_details_list.php?article_id=755 to http://www.quadrant.org.au/php/archive_details_list.php?article_id=755

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]