Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romance-Interstate standards analogies
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was RESULT. DELETE Rich Farmbrough 02:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Idiosyncratic. Delete. Evercat 01:49, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Heh, heh. Idiosyncratic may be too polite. It is amusing though, but represents personal musings rather than verifiable information. Delete. older≠wiser 02:31, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN --SPUI (talk) 02:50, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Pfft, this could have been a speedy... Delete ugen64 02:52, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete ... original research? - Vague | Rant 02:55, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Original research -- Cleduc 05:26, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Original musings. Jonathunder 05:32, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)
- Delete, original research. Sietse 15:29, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- "Free love on the freelove freeway, the lovin's free and the road is long..." Delete. complete nonsensical crap. Too stupd for BJAODN. -R. fiend 17:30, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep although the quote above mine is funny with the exception with the delete vote. I think it is interesting to make analogies between love and the road; it is rather interesting. --GoofyGuy 23:27, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, more speculation from User:SamuraiClinton. Rhobite 02:53, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense essay. — Gwalla | Talk 03:54, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ha ha ha. Delete - David Gerard 10:58, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - patent nonsense. Fawcett5 02:18, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. some very "original" research Bonus Onus 19:53, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.