Talk:Henry Hudson Bridge

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photos

To view PHOTOS of the bridge, go to: http://thebassguy.com/henryhudsonbridge

these pics are cool and artistic and all, (Some are VERY pretty, it is a pretty bridge) but this is apparently a commercial site, so I'd say this link is fine here but not a good link for the main article? ++Lar: t/c 22:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the photos are great, lots of different perspectives of the bridge. I don't the the commercial status of the site makes it reason for excluding (structurae & google maps are for profit also). It would make a good addition. Cacophony 22:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right! Added. ++Lar: t/c 23:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

main article?

I don't see how Transportation in New York City is the main article for Henry Hudson Bridge. The main article for Henry Hudson Bridge is Henry Hudson Bridge. If Henry Hudson Bridge should be in a transportation in NYC category or something, then it would be more appropriate to add it to the category. It is inappropriate to start the article about a particular bridge with a link to a transportation article. Maybe a see also seciton or something. Just not at the top of the article. Cacophony 22:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Not opposed to a see also section reference but it's not a main IMHO. This was an anonymous edit IIRC. ++Lar: t/c 22:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maint

Not to count how many angels dance on the head of a pin but should the maint field in the box say TBTA or MTA or both? TBTA is a sub of the other one. Giving the name of one and linking to the other may be confusing. Maybe not the most earth shattering distinction... ++Lar: t/c 13:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Henry Hudson Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]