Talk:FedExForum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal FedExForum is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Untitled

It says "The FedExForum arena is 805,850 sq. feet in size covering 14 acres."

But 805,850 sq. feet = 18 acres
and 14 acres = 609 840 sq feet.

Can anyone resolve this mismatch?

I think perhaps its talking that in a space of 14 acres there is 805,850 sq feet. for example a skyscraper can take up 1 acre on the ground but have way more sq footage than that of one acre. I believe thats what its referring to. not a direct Conversion from sq feet to acres.

Poorly Written

The grammar and overall writing of this article is horrible. It needs to be re-written. It also seems this article was written as an advertisement rather than an informative article. Due to both these issues, and as evidenced by the deplorable grammar of this article, perhaps no one from Memphis should be allowed to write it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ersatz723 (talk • contribs)

Please don't slander articles, editors, or whole cities when voicing your displeasure with an article. As this is Wikipedia, "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit", you are more than welcome to take a crack at cleaning up this article. -Rhrad 18:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is FedExForum unique?

The first sentence of the article, "FedExForum is one of the most unique arenas in the NBA", piqued my interest. I read on, hoping to find out which architectural feature, invention or design makes the arena so unique. Unfortunately, I was left hanging.

If anyone can expand on what makes the FedExForum so unique & different from other arenas, I think it would be a great addition to this article. -Rhrad 18:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's no stub now, that's for sure. --Pwnage8 (talk) 03:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See-thru shot clocks

Why does the article have two (albeit small) paragraphs about the see-thru shot clocks, especially since there is no source for the information in them (and the latter paragraph is about the devices in other NBA arenas, to boot)? 64.85.229.248 (talk) 05:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It took all of one Google search to find a source and add it. -- Otto (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Grindhouse

I'd like to see a citation on "The Grindhouse" nickname (as best as possible). Also I question the wiki page the term links to. It links to exploitation movies which has one definition for grind house. However the term used here would appear to reference handwork. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.41.31.109 (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Name "FedExFoum

Why is FedExForum one word instead of FedEx Forum? --BigMac1212 (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:FedExForum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is poorly written; between the poor grammar(must've been a Memphian)and it's advertisement tone, it needs a re-write.Ersatz723 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FedExForum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]